RELIGION AND DISABILITIES

ADVOCACY BY RELIGIOUS SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS

Authors

  • Islamiyatur Rokhmah Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ellyda Rizky Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v15i02.9566

Keywords:

Religion, disability, advocacy

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to describe the concept of advocacy of religious organizations carried out by MPM PP Muhammadiyah, YAKKUM, YAKETUNIS and the role of these organizations in implementing advocacy for persons with disabilities. Methods: This study uses a qualitative method by collecting data through primary data. Data socio-religious organizations that provide assistance to persons with disabilities and using secondary data, that is documentation, literature, magazines. Informants in the research are the head of the organization and the beneficiaries of the organization. Methods: Employing a qualitative research design, data were gathered through primary sources including interviews with organizational leaders and beneficiaries. Secondary data were collected from organizational documents, literature, and periodicals related to socio-religious support for persons with disabilities. Results: Findings reveal that all studied organizations share a profound commitment to empowering vulnerable groups, particularly persons with disabilities. Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize the importance of integrating multiple advocacy approaches for persons with disabilities, namely the medical model, the charity model, and the social model that utilizes the social relational approach. This combination enables a more comprehensive and effective advocacy to address the needs and uphold the rights of persons with disabilities in a holistic manner.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2010). Mempertautkan Ulum Al-Din, Al-Fikr Al-Islamy dan Dirasah Islamiyyah: Sumbangan Keilmuan Islam untuk Peradaban Global. Ngaji Seputar Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis. https://seputarquranhadist.wordpress.com/

Abdullah, M. A. (2012). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonesi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Aisyah, S. (2016). Panduan Materi Dasar Baitul Arqom ’Aisyiyah. Majelis Pembinaan Kader.

Anshari, M., Nuzula, M. F., Suriadi, S., & Nuha, U. (2021). PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DAN DISABILITAS: TELAAH PEMIKIRAN ABDULLAH NASKIH ULWAN. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v15i1.573

Callus, A.-M. (2017). Radical inclusive education: disability, teaching and struggles for liberation: Radical inclusive education: disability, teaching and struggles for liberation, by Anat Greenstein, London, Routledge, 2016, 154 pp., £26.99 (paperback), ISBN 978-0-415-70925-5. Disability & Society, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1294386

Foucault, M. (2008). Psychiatric Power. Palgrave MacMillan.

Greenstein, A. (2015). Radical inclusive education: Disability, teaching and struggles for liberation. In Radical Inclusive Education: Disability, Teaching and Struggles for Liberation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690483

Jakarta, U. N. (2016). S OC IAL - R ELATIO N AL MO DEL D A L A M U N D A N G - UN D A N G P EN Y A N D A N G. 3(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030207

Mallisa’, R. (2021). Pendidikan Agama Kristen yang Terintegrasi Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter dan Mental Penyandang Disabilitas. PEADA’ : Jurnal Pendidikan Kristen, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.34307/peada.v2i1.26

Masyitoh, D., MNustika, R. D., Alfaza, A. S., A.F., H., & Hasyim, U. A. F. A. (2020). Amin Abdullah dan Paradigma Integrasi Interkoneksi. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 2(1).

Meyer, L. H. (2016). The social construction of radical inclusive education: Contesting dis-ability. PsycCRITIQUES, 61(25). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040272

Moleong., Lexy. J. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (R. Karya, Ed.).

Morris, J. (n.d.). Feminism, gender and disability.

Morris, J. (1991). Pride Against Prejudice – A Personal Politics of Disability. The Women Pers.

Mugeere, A. B., Omona, J., State, A. E., & Shakespeare, T. (2020). “Oh God! Why Did You Let Me Have This Disability?”: Religion, Spirituality and Disability in Three African countries. Journal of Disability and Religion, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2019.1698387

Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. ,. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reindal, S. M. (2008). A social relational model of disability: A theoretical framework for special needs education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250801947812

Ro’fah. (2015). Teori Disabilitas: Sebuah Literature Review. , 2(1), 2015, h.137-160. Jurnal Difabel, 2 (1), 137–160.

Rusdianto. (2018). Integrasi Pendidikan dan Implikasi Terhadap Lembaga Pendidikan di Indonesia. Pendidikan Islam 7.

Siswanto, S. (2015). Perspektif Amin Abdullah tentang Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Kajian Islam. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.2.376-409

Talfinao, T. (2018). Peran Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Keluarga terhadap Prilaku Anak (3rd ed.). Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.

Waston, W. (2016). Pemikiran Epistemologi Amin Abdullah dan Relevansinya Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 17(01). https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v17i01.2102

Wenno, K. V. (2020). Memahami Karya Allah Melalui Penyandang Disabilitas Dengan Menggunakan Kritik Tanggapan Pembaca Terhadap Yohaner 9:2:3 (4th ed.). Teologi dan Pelayanan Kristiani.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2026

Citation Check