Quality of Education in Islamic Schools: A Bibliometric Review Study

Authors

  • Nadia Nur Ifani Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Asti Putri Kartiwi Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

Keywords:

Bibliometric Analysis, Density, Network, Quality of Islamic Education VOS viewer

Abstract

For decades, the state of education in Muslim-majority countries has garnered worldwide attention. This literature study was conducted using a bibliometric analysis method adapted from the VOSviewer software to examine the literature on the quality of Islamic education. Data from 500 studies related to this topic were sourced from the Web of Science, spanning the years from 2000 to 2018. The results of the analysis were presented and discussed using various approaches, including authors, keywords, references (cited research articles), types of research work, countries of origin, and research institutions. The research findings indicate that bibliometric analysis proves to be an effective means of elucidating the theoretical foundations within the literature and constructing a comprehensive theoretical framework regarding the quality of Islamic education. Consequently, this study offers valuable recommendations based on the literature review

References

Aguinis, H., Dalton, D. R., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Meta-Analytic Choices and Judgment Calls: Implications for Theory Building and Testing, Obtained Effect Sizes, and Scholarly Impact. Journal of Management, 37(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310377113

Al-Muslim, M., & Arifin, Z. (2015). The usability of SEEQ in quality evaluation of arabic secondary education in Malaysia.International Education Studies, 8(3), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p202

Ali, H. M., & Musah, M. B. (2012). Investigation of Malaysian higher education quality culture and workforce performance. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(3), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211240330

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Azra, A. (2023). Islamic Studies in Indonesia, from IAIN to UIN. In Islam, Education and Radicalism in Indonesia (Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 196–207). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003269229-12

Baporikar, N. (2021). Stakeholder Approach for Quality Higher Education. In Research Anthology on Preparing School Administrators to Lead Quality Education Programs (Vol. 89, Issue 3, pp. 1664–1690). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1- 7998-3438-0.ch075

Bogue, E. G. (1993). On Q: Causing Quality in Higher Education. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 610–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778 456

Brika, S. K. M., Algamdi, A., Chergui, K., & Musa, A. A. (2021). Quality of Higher Education : A Bibliometric Review Study. 6(May), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.666087

Brookes, B. C. (1985). “Sources of information on specific subjects” by S.C. Bradford. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000406

de Matos Pedro, E., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2020). Bridging intellectual capital, sustainable development and quality of life in higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020479

DiDomenico, E., & Bonnici, J. (1996). Assessing service quality within the educational environment. Education, 116, 353+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A18434919/A ONE?u=anon~edf0d611&sid=bookmark- AONE&xid=d555c497

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45277277

Iranmanesh, M., Moghavvemi, S., Zailani, S., & Hyun, S. S. (2018). The role of trust and religious commitment in Islamic medical tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.14212 40

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity Author ( s ): Alfred J . Lotka Source : Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences , Vol . 16 , No . 12 ( June 19 , 1926 ), Published by : Washington Academy of Sciences Stable URL : https://www.jst. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.

Mulet-Forteza, C., Genovart-Balaguer, J., Merigó, J. M., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2019). Bibliometric structure of IJCHM in its 30 years. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(12), 4574–4604. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0828

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:624 32515

Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0020

Raghuram, S., Tuertscher, P., & Garud, R. (2010). Research Note —Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 983– 999. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227

Salas-Zapata, W. A., Ríos-Osorio, L. A., & Cardona-Arias, J. A. (2018). Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Sustainability: Systematic Review 1990-2016. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018- 0003

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377- 8_13

Waltman, L., and Noyons, L. (2018). Bibliometrics for research management and research evaluation. universiteit Leiden. https://docslib.org/doc/9273260/bibliometrics -for-research-management-and-research- evaluation-a-brief-introduction-bibliometrics- for-research-management-and-research- evaluation

Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. In Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison- Wesley Press.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

13-03-2024

Citation Check