Educational Evaluation: A Simple Additive Weighting Approach For Decision-Making In Transformational Leadership Development Systems

Authors

  • Yeti Komalasari Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
  • Anton Abdullah Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Oka Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
  • Fitri Masito Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
  • Badeni Badeni Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kristiawan Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

Keywords:

Education Evaluation, Simple Additive Weighting, Transformational Leader

Abstract

This study uses the weighting approach to evaluate decision-making strategies in order to rank the importance of the traits that a leader must have in order for the Cadet Regiment Commander to create a transformational leadership model. A decision support system's weighted sum or simple weighting method can be applied to issue solving through the use of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). This kind of research is called mixed method, since it uses a survey methodology along with qualitative and descriptive quantitative research methods. The author, who is actively engaged in the research, is the research instrument in and of himself. The purpose of this study is to determine the respondents by means of a purposive technique, in which information for research objectives will only come from specific individuals or parties. The study's findings should determine which leader qualities are most important for creating a transformational leadership model. This will be done by applying the SAW method, which is based on five weighting criteria for transformational leadership: motivation and traits, knowledge, skills, and abilities, organizational culture, vision, and vision implementation. Of the five characteristics of the leader, motivation and traits are the criteria that are the top priority to be developed based on the respondents' assessment with a value of 22.3%. Where a leader must have the ability to achieve, ambition, persistence, passion, initiative, have leadership motivation and have the values of honesty/integrity, confidence, originality, creativity and flexibility/adaptability needed to set an example, encourage and motivate other cadets towards achieving the vision of the organization. Followed by weighting on other criteria such as knowledge, skills, and abilities at 20.5%, organizational culture at 18.8%, vision at 19.5%, and vision implementation at 18.9%.

References

Achmad, Y. F., Laday, R. K., & Kusuma, D. A. P. (2021). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Di Pt Cirill Indonesia. Sebatik, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v25i1.1169

Asbari, M., Fayzhall, M., Goestjahjanti, F. S., Winanti, Yuwono, T., Hutagalung, D., Basuki, S., Maesaroh, S., Mustofa, Chidir, G., Yani, A., & Purwanto, A. (2020). Peran Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Organisasi Pembelajaran Terhadap Kapasitas Inovasi Sekolah. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1).

Asminah, A. (2022). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weigthing Untuk Penentuan Level Kondisi Penyandang Disabilitas. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v3i4.1391

Basirun, B., & Turimah, T. (2022). Konsep Kepemimpinan Transformasional. Mindset: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.58561/mindset.v1i1.28

Darsin, D., & Triyana, D. (2021). Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Jurnal Informasi Dan Komputer, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.35959/jik.v9i1.197

Devi, M. Y., Hidayanthi, R., & Fitria, Y. (2022). Model-Model Evaluasi Pendidikan dan Model Sepuluh Langkah dalam Penilaian. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1934

Fikri Yusmansyah, E., Sugandi, N., Miftahussalam, M., Saefurridjal, A., & Muchtarom, M. (2022). Konsep Dasar-Dasar Pertimbangan Dan Strategi Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan, Humaniora, Linguistik Dan Sosial (JAGADDHITA), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.58268/jagaddhita.v1i1.23

Ghufron, G. (2020). Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan. Fenomena, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v19i1.34

Hermanto, H., & Izzah, N. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Motor Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v6i2.669

House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300306

Jamilus, J., & Muntatsiroh, A. (2023). Pentingnya Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam dalam Sebuah Lembaga Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(1).

Latifah, Z. (2021). Pentingnya Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi. Seminar Nasional, Vol 1, No.

Lestari, S., & Kusumah, Y. (2022). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Peserta Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Pengawas Bagi Pejabat Struktural. Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v3i4.2161

Maharta, A. N. F., & Sumardi, D. (2021). Kepemimpinan Transformasional Suatu Alternatif Pembelajaran Model Kepemimpinan Di Era Society 5.0 Bagi Taruna Akademi Angkatan Udara. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Teknologi Dan Inovasi Indonesia (SENASTINDO), 3. https://doi.org/10.54706/senastindo.v3.2021.132

Mardiah, M., & Syarifudin, S. (2019). Model-model evaluasi pendidikan. Mitra Ash-shibyan: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.46963/mash.v2i1.24

Mattayang, B. (2019). Tipe Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis. JEMMA | Journal of Economic, Management and Accounting, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35914/jemma.v2i2.247

Miswanti, M. (2016). Pengintegrasian Model Leadership Menuju Model yang Lebih Komprhensip dan Parsimoni. Telaah Bisnis, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.35917/tb.v15i1.11

Miswanto. (2008). Pengembangan Model Kepemimpinan Transformasional. Jurnal Fokus Ekonomi, 7(3).

Mustakim, B. (2020). Perspektif Psikologi Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Irsyad : Jurnal Bimbingan, Penyuluhan, Konseling, Dan Psikoterapi Islam, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/irsyad.v8i2.1965

Rahayu, S., & Sindar, A. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.54082/jiki.28

Setiadi, A., Yunita, Y., & Ningsih, A. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting(SAW) Untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.572

Sintani, L., Fachrurazi, Mulyadi, Nurcholifah, I., Fauziah, Hartono, S., & Jusman, I. A. (2022). Dasar Kepemimpinan. Cendikia Mulia Mandiri Foundation, February.

Sofiah Sinaga, N., Aprilinda, D., & Putra Budiman, A. (2021). Konsep Kepemimpinan Transformasional. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.36418/cerdika.v1i7.123

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian pendidikan : kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, R&D dan penelitian tindakan. In Alfabeta,cv.

Waskito, R. R., Setya, B., & Daryanto. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Ptpn Xii Perkebunan Malangsari. Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 10(1).

Widyacahyani, A., Herawati, J., & Subiyanto, E. D. (2020). Dampak Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Kepemimpinan Transaksional dan Servant Leadership terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Sains Manajemen Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 10(1).

Downloads

Published

11-03-2024

Citation Check