ISLAMIC EDUCATION MODEL ORIENTED ON THE VIEWS OF ACEH ULAMA ON CUSTOM SANCTIONS FOR COMMUNITIES FOR VIOLATION OF QANUN JINAYAT IN THE DISTRICT ACEH TAMIANG

Authors

  • Musthafa Musthafa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, Indonesia
  • Asmuni Asmuni Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, Indonesia
  • Zainul Fuad Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i03.4247

Keywords:

Ulama’s view, Sanctions, Qanun, Aceh, Islamic Education Model

Abstract

This research looks at what Acehnese scholars think about the customary punishments for people who break the khalwat qanun in Aceh Tamiang District, based on Aceh Province Qanun Number 6 of 2004 about Jinayat Law in the progressive Islamic education model. This research method is normative and empirical. It looks at legal principles and norms in laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and how legal norms are used in society. It then looks at the problem from the point of view of Acehnese scholars regarding violations of the khalwat qanun. The results of the study show that when putting customary life into practice, regions can set up different policies to help adat and traditional institutions in their areas that are based on Islamic law and work in line with it. Gampong or village residents who break the khalwat or make the Sharia look bad can first go to a Gampong Traditional Meeting (RAG). One reason why khalwat offenders aren't caned in Aceh Tamiang is because the case was settled in a way that was unfair to both local elites and the general public. A number of Khalwat cases were resolved through customary mechanisms. Sanctions such as the "banquet of bad luck," handing over tens of sacks of cement for village infrastructure development, and washing and humiliating in public places are forms of settlement for indigenous peoples. Many indigenous peoples outside Aceh also carry out sanctions like this. considerations of efficiency, expediency, and trustworthiness. Through customary mechanisms, khalwat cases are handled more quickly and efficiently than in the Sharia Court. In addition, the implementation of Qonun Jinayah can be carried out using a progressive education model approach that aims to raise awareness in every individual community about the enforcement and implementation of Qonun Jinayah in the Aceh Tamiang region.

References

Abu, A.-Y., & Bakar, M. H. (2006). Hukum Pidana Islam di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Dinas Syariat Islam, Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam.

Abu, A.-Y., & Bakar, M. H. (2008). Hukum Pidana Islam di Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Dinas Syari’at Islam.

Amnesty International. (2017). Pernyataan Amnesty International : Mencambuk Pria Gay Suatu Kekejaman yang Keterlaluan. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pernyataan-amnesty-international-mencambuk-pria-gay-suatu-kekejaman-yang-keterlaluan/3867862.html

Azizy, A. Q. A., Azizy, Q., & Arifin, B. (2002). Eklektisisme Hukum Nasional: Kompetisi Antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Umum. Gama Media.

Berutu, A. G. (2020). Formalisasi Syariat Islam Aceh Dalam Tatanan Politik Nasional. Pena Persada.

Bugin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Kencana.

Darma Nagara, M. R. N., & Hendiyani, M. F. (2022). The Analysis of Aceh Law and Its Relevancy on National Law from Human Right Perspective. Jurnal Terapan Pemerintahan Minangkabau, 2(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtpm.v2i2.2508

Feener, R. M. (2013). Shari’a and Social Engineering: The Implementation of Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia. University Press.

Hamdi, S. (2018). Eksistensi Peran Majelis Adat Aceh dalam Mensosialisasikan Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam di Wilayah Barat-Selatan Aceh. Ar-Raniry, International Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 115–137. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/jar/article/view/7578%0Ahttp://journalarraniry.com/ojs/index.php/jar/article/view/196/97

Idris, M., & Mokodenseho, S. (2021). Model Pendidikan Islam Progresif. J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpai.v7i2.11682

Lev, D. S. (1985). Colonial Policy and the Genesis of the Indonesian State. Comell Southenast Asia Program.

Majelis Adat Aceh. (2012). Pedoman Peradilan Adat di Aceh Untuk Peradilan Adat Yang Adildan Akuntabel. Majelis Adat Aceh.

Majelis Adat Aceh Kabupaten Aceh Utara. (2005). Peran Adat Aceh sebagai alat Pemersatu dalam Masyarakat (Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandangan Cendikiawan). In Majelis Adat Aceh Kabupaten Aceh Utara Lhokseumawe.

Majid, A. (2007). Syariat Islam Dalam Realitas Sosial, Jawaban Islam Terhadap Masyarakat Di Wilayah Syari’at. Yayasan Pena Banda Aceh.

Manan, H. T. A. (2020). Mahkamah Syari’iyah Aceh Dalam Politik Hukum Nasional. Kencana.

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Pamulutan, M. A. (2012). Eksekusi Rajam Bagi Pelaku Zina Muhsan, Memenuhi Hak Allah Dan Membela Hak Insan. Badan Arsip Dan Perpustakaan Aceh.

Siddiq, M., & Fahmi, C. (2009). Problematika Qanun Khalwat Analisis Terhadap Perspektif Mahasiswa Aceh. Aceh Justice Resorce Center (Ajrc), Banda Aceh.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (1995). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Tebba, S. (2003). Sosiologi Hukum Islam. UII Press.

Umar, M. (2008). Peradaban Aceh (Tamadun) II. Baboen Jaya.

Zainal, E. H. (2010). Perbandingan Mazhab Tentang Hukum Pidana Islam, AlMuqarranah Al-Mazahib Fi Al-Jinayah. Fakultas Syariah IAIN-SU.

Downloads

Published

21-10-2022

Citation Check