A STUDY OF ISLAMIC LEGAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE CONCEPT OF COLLECTIVE PROPERTY IN INDONESIA BASED ON CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND THE ISLAMIC EDUCATION MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i03.4175Abstract
Analysis of the Concept of Joint Assets in the Compilation of Islamic Law reviewed Based on Corrective Justice Values is an Islamic law study that discusses legal issues regarding joint assets. Based on the reality and legal developments that occur in Indonesian society, which is very dynamic, and from several court decisions, it was found that, in general, the panel of judges at the Religious Courts, in deciding cases for claims for the distribution of joint assets, did not depart from these laws and regulations, namely by dividing joint property equally (half share) between husband and wife. This rule causes many problems that occur when practicing the rulings of the religious courts, because not a few people consider that the distribution of joint assets does not fulfill a sense of justice. For this reason, it is necessary to understand in detail the distribution of joint assets based on the inculcation of Islamic values through education. This research model (mode of inquiry) is qualitative. While the approach used is philosophical legal research, In conclusion, this study shows that the distribution of joint assets between ex-husband and ex-wife, based on the value of corrective justice, should be divided according to the amount of effort between the two in obtaining assets during marriage, dividing equally (50:50, Article 97 KHI). is considered that there are times when not fulfilling a sense of justice is necessary when one party has committed an act that is detrimental to the other party (husband or wife) because it does not carry out what has become its obligation in the long term.
References
Alfarabi. 2013. “Harta Bersama Gono-Gini Hukum Perdata.†2013. http://alfarabi1706.blogspot.com/2013/01/harta-bersama-gono-gini-hukum perdata.html.
Aristoteles. 2004. Nicomachean Ethics: Sebuah Kitab Suci Etika Terjemah Oleh Embun Kenyowati. Jakarta: Teraju.
Budiarto, Yohanes; Wardani, Rani Puspita. 2005. “Peran Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural Dan Keadilan Interaksional Perusahaan Terhadap Komitmen Karyawan Pada Perusahaan (Studi Pada Perusahaan X).†Jurnal Psikologi 3 (2): 109–26.
Bugin, Burhan. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Damanhuri, A. 2007. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Harta Bersama. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Darmodiharjo, Darji, and Shidarta. 2006. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dwisvimiar, Inge. 2011. “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum.†Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 527.
Fadhilah, N. 2013. “Dari Plato Hingga Hukum Progresif.†Jurnal Cita Hukum 5 (1).
Harahap, Yahya. 1991. Kedudukan, Kewenangan Dan Acara Peradilan Agama.
Jamil, Latif. 1982. Aneka Hukum Perceraian Indoenesia. Jakarta: Ghia Indonesia.
Kurniawan, Faizal, Erni Agustin, and Rizki Amalia. 2018. “Unsur Kerugian Dalam Unjustified Enrichment Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Korektif (Corrective Justice).†Yuridika 33 (1): 19. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7201.
Manan, Abdul. 2006. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Manan, Abdul, and M Fauzan. 2001. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2008. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Miller, Christian B. 2017. “Distributive Justice and Empirical Moral Psychology.†The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nawawi, Kholil. 2018. “Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.†Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 1 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v1i1.104.
Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Edisi kedu. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. 1995. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Suliantoro, Bernadus Wibowo, and Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini. 2018. “Konsep Keadilan Sosial Dalam Kebhinekaan Menurut Pemikiran Karen J . Warren.†RESPONS 23 (01): 39–58.
Susanto, Happy. 2008. Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Saat Terjadi Perceraian. Jakarta: Visimedia.
Syaifuddin, Muhammad. 2013. Hukum Perceraian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Thalib, Sayuti. 1986. Hukum Kekeluargaan Indonesia: Berlaku Bagi Umat Islam. Jakarta: Universitas Indoenisa (UI-Press).
Utomo, Setiawan Budi. 1997. Fiqh Aktual Jawaban Tuntas Masalah Kontemporer.
UU Nomor 1 Tahun. 1974. Perkawinan. Republik Indonesia.
Yulianto, Jony Eko. 2016. “Studi Fenomenologis Interaksi Kuasa Pada Relasi Perkawinan Wirausahawan Perempuan Di Indonesia.†INSAN Jurnal Psikologi Dan Kesehatan Mental 1 (2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
