KONSEP PENDIDIKAN RELIGIUS RASIONAL: STUDI PEMIKIRAN BUYA HAMKA DAN MOHAMMAD NATSIR

Authors

  • Agung Wahyu Utomo Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Ali Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Muh. Nur Rochim Maksum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i4.3809

Keywords:

Educational Thought, Religious-Rational, Buya Hamka, Mohammad Natsir

Abstract

This study aims to find out the thoughts of Buya Hamka and Mohammad Natsir regarding rational religious Islamic education and identify similarities and differences in the thoughts of the two figures regarding rational religious Islamic education. This research is motivated by two main problems, namely the weak vision of Islamic education and epistemological problems in dichotomous Islamic scholarship. Therefore, the concept of rational religious Islamic education which combines worldly and spiritual elements is one of the solutions in the midst of educational backwardness. Buya Hamka and Mohammad Natsir are national Islamic figures who have a high role in education in Indonesia. This type of research is a type of library research. The research approach in this study used historical and philosophical approaches and data analysis using content and comparative analysis. The results of this study conclude that the concept of thinking of rational religious Islamic education according to Buya Hamka and Mohammad Natsir is guidance that combines ukhrawi elements (morals, spiritual, emotional) and worldly elements (mind, body, skills) based on monotheism to complement nature and lead humans to fitrah original. Then the similarities of the two concepts are found in meaning, educational goals, student subjects, and material that must include religious and world knowledge. While the differences seen in the curriculum, teachers and learning methods.

Keywords: Educational Thought, Religious-Rational, Buya Hamka, Mohammad Natsir

 

References

Abuddin Nata . 2010. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group.

Abuddin Nata 2016. Pendidikan dalam perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ali, Mohammad dan Abidin, Zainal. 2017. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Bernuansa Keindonesiaan. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Ali, Mohammad dan Rushd, Dartim Ibn. 2020. Sejarah Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia: Sebuah Pendekatan Interdisiliner. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Al-Jumbulati, Ali. 2002. Perbandingan Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Abdullah, M Amin. 1999. Studi Agama: Normativitas dan Historivitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. 1987. Islamization of Knowledge: General principle and Work Plan. USA: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Assegaf, Abd. Rahman. 2004. Membangun Format Pendidikan Islam di era Globalisasi dalam Pendidikan Islam dan Tantangan Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: Al-Ruzz.

Assegaf, Abd. Rahman. 2011. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Asyub, Ibn Syahr. Manaqib Ali bin Abi Thalib. Jilid 4

Bakker, Anton. 1999. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Buzdar, Muhammad Ayub dkk. 2015. “Religius Orientations as a Predictor of Rational Thinking among Secondary School Studentsâ€. Jurnal. International Journal of Thinking Skill & Creativity), Vol. 16.

Dinata, Syaiful. 2021. Pemikiran Harun Nasution (Religius-Rasional) Tentang Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal An-Nida’: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam. Vol. 45. No. 2.

El-Rayess, Amra Sabic. 2020. “Epistemological shifts in knowledge and education in Islam: A new perspective on the emergence of radicalization amongst Muslimsâ€. Jurnal. International Journal of Educational Development, Volume 73, Issue 4.

Hamka. 2014. Pribadi Hebat. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

. 2015. Lembaga Hidup. Jakarta: Republika Penerbit.

. 2016. Dari Lembah Cita-Cita. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

. 2015. Falsafah Hidup. Jakarta: Republika Penerbit.

Hamka, Irfan. 2014. Ayah. Jakarta: Republika.

Hardani dkk. 2020. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu.

Jailani, Kamarudin. 2015. “Philosophy of Science Actualization for Islamic Science Development: Philosophical Study on an Epistemological Framework for Islamic Sciencesâ€. Jurnal. Pacific Sciences Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 3.

Kurniawan, Fajar. “Pengembangan Teori Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Muhammad Jawwad Ridla (Religius Konservatif, Religius Rasional, Pragmatis Instrumental)â€. Jurnal. Jurnal at-Ta’lim, Vol. 18, No. 1.

Luth, Thohir. 1999. M Natsir Dakwah dan Pemikirannya. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Nata, Abuddin. 2012. Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Natsir, M. 1973. Capita Selecta. Cetakan III. (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang).

Natsir, M. 1983. Fiqhud Da’wah. Surakarta: YKPI Surakarta.

Nashir, Abdul. 2007. Buya Hamka dan Mohamad natsir Tentang Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib. Vol. 3. No. 1.

Purwanto, Agus. “Konflik Agama dan Sains Saat Iniâ€. Dikutip dari PWMU.com pada 11 Oktober 2022, pukul 10.10.

Ramayulis dan Syamsul Nizar. 2005. Ensiklopedi Tokoh Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Quantum Teaching.

Ridla, Muhammad Jawwad. 2002. Tiga Aliran Utama Teori Pendidikan Islam (Perspektif Sosiologis-Filosofis). Terj. Mahmud Arif dari judul “al-Fikr al-Tarbawi al-Islamiyyu Muqaddimat fi Ushulih al-Ijtima’iyyati al-Aqlamiyyatiâ€. Yogayakarta: PT Tiara Wacana.

Rouf, Abdul. 1999. Dimensi Tasawuf HAMKA. Selangor: Piagam Intan SDN.

Sa’adah, Alimatus dan Hariadi, M. Farhan. 2020. “Pemikiran Ibnu Miskawaih (Religius-Rasional) tentang Pendidikan dan Relevansinya di Era Industri 4.0â€. Jurnal. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, vol. 16. No. 1.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sumiriyah. 2016. “Perbandingan Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam Hasan Al-Banna dan Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullahâ€. Tesis. Jakarta: Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an.

Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Pasal 31 ayat 1-2

Wahhab, Abdul Aziz. 2008. Anatomi Organisasi Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Published

31-01-2023

Citation Check