IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM PENJAMINAN MUTU INTERNAL DI UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO LAMPUNG

Authors

  • Garianto Garianto Program Doktor, Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yurnalis Etek Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Koderi Koderi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ihsan Dacholfany Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i4.3390

Keywords:

Quality assurance system, Institutions, University of Muhammadiyah

Abstract

Muhammadiyah Metro University is an Islamic university and the only best private university in Sumatra, according to the International Institute of Webometrics, July 2020. However, some lecturers and students still do not fully understand the existence of quality assurance institutions (LPM) in higher education standards (SPT) that guarantee the quality of higher education, so UM Metro has not achieved its vision and mission optimally. All stakeholders have not fully felt the results of quality assurance (Quality Assurance). This study aims to find out and describe the state of the internal quality assurance system (SPMI) at UM Metro, starting with how to determine, implement, evaluate, control, and improve. Research is qualitative description research with qualitative descriptive analysis. Data is collected employing interviews, documentation, and observations. The results of the research analysis on the implementation of SPMI at UM Metro: through the following stages: 1) Stages of setting standards, vision, mission, regulations, policies, academics, academic quality manuals, and so on in the study program, there is a competence of graduates. 2) The implementation of higher education standards is socialized to all concerned. The importance of a quality education system in implementing higher education is carried out by qualified human resources and leadership support. 3) Evaluation carried out in the implementation of higher education standards starting weekly, monthly, and yearly involving a team of experts under the supervision of LPM. 4) Control, findings from the results of follow-up evaluations that have been well improved by rewarding, and those that have not been well-given guidance according to higher education standards. 5) Improvement, the results of the implementation of previous developments, namely the establishment, implementation, evaluation, and control, are further improved so that users of higher education services feel the results. The implications show that SPMI is very important in universities to achieve a level of excellence in higher education that can be felt by all stakeholders (Stake-HolderS)

References

Arifudin, O. (2019). Manajemen Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (Spmi) sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi), 3(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol3.iss1.pp161-169

Bendriyanti, R. P. (2019). “Manajemen Mutu Layanan Akademik Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Lulusan Di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Provinsi Bengkulu.†Jurnal TARBAWI, 1(1).

E.Mulyasa. (2016). Manajemen Pendidikan Karakter. Bumi Aksara.

Elton, L. (1995a). University Teaching: A Professional Model for Quality. In Buckinghan:Open University Press,.

Elton, L. (1995b). University Teaching: A Professional Model for Quality. Open University Press.

Ferils, M., & Syarifuddin. (2020). Implementasi sistem penjaminan mutu internal Universitas Gadjah Mada. Competitiveness, 9(3), 21–36.

Kemenristekdikti. (2008). Pedoman Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Pendidikan Akademik - Pendidikan Vokasi - Pendidikan Profesi - Pendidikan Jarak Jauh.

Kementerian Riset, D. P. M. (2018). Pedoman Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal. Direktorat Penjaminan Mutu Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Koswara, D., & Hartini, N. (2018). Bunga Rampai Administrasi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Alfa Beta.

Margareta, R. T. E., Ismanto, B., & Sulasmono, B. S. (2018). Strategi Pemasaran Sekolah Dalam Peningkatan Minat Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Delta Model. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i1.p1-14

Mauly, Y., & Gustini, N. (2019). Implementasi SPMI dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Islamic Educational Management, 4(2), 229–244. http://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/isema

Mubarak, F. (2015). Faktor dan Indikator Mutu Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Management OfEducation, 1(1). https://doi.org/ISSN 977-24442404.

Mulyasa, E., & Aryani, W. D. (2022). Implementasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Di Era Merdeka Belajar. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(2), 933. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.8.2.933-944.2022

Mutohar, P. M. (2019). “Formulasi Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Institut Agama Islam di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Al-Idarah: Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2).

Rohia. (2010). Manajemen Sekolah. PT Refika Adikarya.

Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education: Third edition, Total QualityManagement in Education.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Published

29-12-2022

Citation Check