Analysis of Religious Character Value In Literacy Programs Based on Critical Pedagogic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i03.4421Keywords:
religious character values, literacy programs, elementary school, critical pedagogyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the character values that are instilled through literacy programs implemented at the elementary school level. This analysis is based on a critical pedagogic approach. This study uses content analysis research methods on the literacy program documents of the ministry of education, especially those implemented at the elementary school level. The research findings show that there is integration of instilling character values in students through literacy activities so that students become individual lifelong learners, character values instilled through literacy programs are one way to achieve real educational goals. In addition, based on an analysis with a critical pedagogic approach, the integration of character values in literacy programs is an educational process to make humans become fully human in dealing with the problems they face. It can be concluded that the integration of character values in the literacy program is one of the efforts of the government to strive for humanization of education. Through the integration of these character values, the government can develop the character and manners of students so that they become lifelong learners who have good character.
References
Bredemeier, B. L., & Shields, D. L. (2019). Social Justice, Character Education, and Sport: A Position Statement. Quest, 71(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2019.1608270
Carl, J., Barratt, J., Wanner, P., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., & Pfeifer, K. (2022). The Effectiveness of Physical Literacy Interventions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. In Sports Medicine (Vol. 52, Issue 12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01738-4
Chen, Y. W., & Lawless, B. (2019). Teaching Critical Moments within Neoliberal Universities: Exploring Critical Intercultural Communication Pedagogy. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 48(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2019.1683056
Danvers, E. (2021). Prevent/Ing critical thinking? The pedagogical impacts of Prevent in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872533
Dobson, J., & Dobson, T. (2021). Empowering student voice in a secondary school: Character Education through project-based learning with students as teachers. Teacher Development, 25(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1865442
Farokhzadian, J., Jouparinejad, S., Fatehi, F., & Falahati-Marvast, F. (2021). Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00599-y
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021a). Enhancing scientific argumentation skill through partnership comprehensive literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012015
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021b). The role of multimodal text to develop literacy and change social behaviour foreign learner. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1446a
Hadianto, D., S. Damaianti, V., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Literacy Teaching Design Integrating Local Culture Discourse and Activities to Enhance Reading Skills. Cogent Education, 9(1), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2016040
Halimah, L., Arifin, R. R. M., Yuliariatiningsih, M. S., Abdillah, F., & Sutini, A. (2020). Storytelling through “Wayang Golek†puppet show: Practical ways in incorporating character education in early childhood. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1794495
Jerome, L., & Kisby, B. (2022). Lessons in character education: incorporating neoliberal learning in classroom resources. Critical Studies in Education, 63(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1733037
Jones, C. J., & Christian, M. (2021). The Results of a Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of the SPARK Literacy Program: An Innovative Approach that Pairs One-on-One Tutoring with Family Engagement. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 26(3), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2020.1809419
Maharani, D., Asrori, & Sulistyarini. (2018). Penerapan pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar pontianak barat. Jurnal Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP UNTAN, 7(12), 1–11. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/30068
McGrath, R. E., Han, H., Brown, M., & Meindl, P. (2022). What does character education mean to character education experts? A prototype analysis of expert opinions. Journal of Moral Education, 51(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1862073
Metcalfe, J., & Moulin-Stożek, D. (2021). Religious education teachers’ perspectives on character education. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1713049
Paul, S. A. S., Hart, P., Augustin, L., Clarke, P. J., & Pike, M. (2020). Parents’ perspectives on home-based character education activities. Journal of Family Studies, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1806097
Peterson, A. (2020). Character education, the individual and the political. Journal of Moral Education, 49(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1653270
Rockenbach, A. N. (2020). Character Education for the Public Good: The Evolution of Character Capacities in and Beyond College. Journal of College and Character, 21(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587x.2019.1696834
Singh, S., Sylvia, M. R., & Ridzi, F. (2015). Exploring the Literacy Practices of Refugee Families Enrolled in a Book Distribution Program and an Intergenerational Family Literacy Program. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0627-0
Veldhuijzen van Zanten, S., Coates, C., Hervas-Malo, M., & McGrath, P. J. (2012). Newborn literacy program effective in increasing maternal engagement in literacy activities: an observational cohort study. BMC Pediatrics, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-100
Wang, J., Herman, J. L., Leon, S., & Epstein, S. (2022). Examining the Effect of an Interdisciplinary Literacy Program on Student Learning. Urban Review, 54(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00610-5
Watson, L. (2019). Educating for inquisitiveness: A case against exemplarism for intellectual character education. Journal of Moral Education, 48(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1589436
Wortmann, K. (2019). Post-critical pedagogy as poetic practice: combining affirmative and critical vocabularies. Ethics and Education, 14(4), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1669942
Zafirah, A., Agusti, F. A., Engkizar, E., Anwar, F., Alvi, A. F., & Ernawati, E. (2018). Penanaman nilai-nilai karakter terhadap peserta didik Melalui permainan congkak sebagai media pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 9(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v8i1.21678
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).