DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS BY INDONESIAN LANGUAGE TEACHERS AT SPECIAL NEEDS SCHOOLS IN PADANG

DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS BY INDONESIAN LANGUAGE TEACHERS AT SPECIAL NEEDS SCHOOLS IN PADANG

Authors

  • Monalisa Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Tressyalina Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v15i03.10654

Keywords:

Teacher's Directive Speech Acts, Special Needs School

Abstract

This study aims to describe: (1) the forms of directive speech acts used by teachers in Indonesian language learning at the Special Education Schools (SLB) of Yayasan Pembina Pendidikan Luar Biasa (YPPLB), SLB Work Shop, and SLB Kasih Ummi; (2) the speech strategies used by teachers in Indonesian language learning at the three schools. This research is a qualitative study using a descriptive-analytical method. The data consist of directive utterances produced by Indonesian language teachers during the learning process in Down Syndrome student classrooms. The data sources are three Indonesian language teachers from three Special Education Schools (SLB), namely YPPLB, SLB Work Shop, and SLB Kasih Ummi. Data were collected through the non-participant observation technique (simak bebas libat cakap) by recording and transcribing the teachers’ utterances, assisted by an audio recording device and a data inventory format. Data analysis combined theory of directive speech acts, politeness strategy theory components, carried out through three stages: (1) data reduction, (2) data display, and (3) conclusion drawing. The findings reveal three conclusions. First, the directive speech acts of Indonesian language teachers at Special Education Schools in Padang City were identified in five forms: commanding (44 data), challenging (23 data), suggesting (14 data), requesting (15 data), and advising (13 data), with commanding as the most dominant form. Second, teachers used only three of the five politeness strategies proposed, namely bald-on-record with positive politeness (52 data), bald-on-record without redress (44 data), and bald-on-record with negative politeness (13 data), with positive-politeness bald-on-record being the most frequently used strategy. opening, core, and closing stages of the lesson.

References

Anani, Sabiqah Sri, and Tressyalina. 2023. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Indy Rahmawati Dalam Talk Show ‘ Satu Jam Lebih Dekat ’ Di TVOne.” Jurnal Idiomatik Vol. 6:127–37.

Anani, Sabiqah Sri, and Tressyalina. 2023. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Indy Rahmawati Dalam Talk Show ‘ Satu Jam Lebih Dekat ’ Di TVOne.” Jurnal Idiomatik Vol. 6:127–37.

Ardianto. 2016. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Wacana Interaksi Kelas Anak Tunarungu.” Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajaran 12(September 2011).

Damayati, Intan Dwi, and Bambang Yulianto. 2022. “Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Pada Pembelajaran Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Sekolah ABK Star Kids: Kajian Pragmatik.” Jurnal Bapala Vol. 9 No.

Elmita, Winda, Ermanto, and Ellya Ratna. 2013. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di TK Nusa Indah Banuaran Padang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 1 No.:139–47.

Elpandy, Farhan, and Tressyalina. 2026. “TINDAK TUTUR ASERTIF DAN STRATEGI BERTUTUR GURU DALAM PEMBELAJARAN TEKS CERPEN KELAS X SMAN 1 2X11 KAYU TANAM.” Junrnal Manajemen Pendidikan 14(01):262–69.

Jefiza, Iqbal, and Tressyalina. 2023. “Analisis Tindak Tutur Direktid Guru Bahasa Inonesia Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Teks Proposal Di Kelas XI SMAN 1 Gunung Talang.” Journal of Education and Humanities 1(1):127–37.

Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Miona, Aprilia Ariesti, and Tressyalina. 2024. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di SMA Negeri 1 Lubuk Sikaping.” Metafora: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra 11(1):55–61. doi: 10.30595/mtf.v11i1.21424.

Noveradia, Irsa, Irma Diani, and Ngudining Rahayu. 2025. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Pada Kegiatan Pembelajaran Di SLBN 5 Kota Bengkulu.” Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus 9(3):491–501.

Nurhamida, Nurhamida, and Tresyalina Tressyalina. 2019. “Strategi Bertutur Dalam Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Bahasa Indonesia Pada Kegiatan Diskusi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 8 No 4.

Oktaviary, Halimatus, Suhartono, and Trinil Dwi Turistiana. 2024. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Di SLB Tunas Kasih Surahbaya (Kajian Pragmatik).” Jurnal Arbitrer Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 6 No.

Pramartha, I. Nyoman Bayu. 2015. “Sejarah Dan Sitem Pendidikan Sekolah Luar Biasa Bagian A Negeri Denpasar Bali.” Jurnal Historia Vol. 3 No.:13–14.

Searle, J. R. 1969. Specch Act: An Essay on the Philosophy Of Language. edited by C. U. Press. New York.

Tressyalina, Mhd Ghaluh Bima, Wulandari Ella, Arief Ermawati, and Noveria Ena. 2026. “Enhancing Students ’ Critical Thinking in Criminal Case Solving : An AI-Based Pragmatic Application for Analyzing Authentic Indonesian Texts and Videos.” Interactive Learning Environments 34(2):543–75. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2504062.

Yule, George. 2016. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zuara, Tarisa, Tressyalina, Ena Noveria, and Herlin Triana. 2026. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Dan Strategi Bertutur Guru Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Pembelajaran Teks Artikel Populer Siswa Kelas VIII SMP.” PAEDAGOGIE 21(1):211–22. doi: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.16068.

Downloads

Published

30-08-2026

Citation Check