CREATIVE THINKING IN ISLAMIC HISTORY LEARNING
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENT PRODUCTS IN INDONESIA AND THAILAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v15i03.10324Keywords:
Creative thinking skills; history learning; student-generated product; comparative study; Indonesia–Thailand; TTCT.Abstract
This study aims to analyze and compare how creative thinking is manifested in student-generated Islamic History learning products in Indonesia and Thailand. The study employed a comparative descriptive qualitative design supported by descriptive quantitative scoring. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured teacher interviews, and documentation of seven student-generated learning products, comprising videos, historical timelines, posters, and a historical anthology in Indonesia, and mind maps, storytelling, and historical performances in Thailand. The products were analyzed using four dimensions of creative thinking derived from Torrance: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Each product was assessed by two expert raters using a five-point creativity rubric, and the resulting scores were used as descriptive quantitative evidence to support the qualitative interpretation. The findings reveal different patterns of creative expression across the two contexts. Indonesian products obtained mean scores of 4.00 for fluency, 3.51 for flexibility, 3.21 for originality, and 4.31 for elaboration. Thai products obtained mean scores of 4.22 for fluency, 4.28 for flexibility, 4.20 for originality, and 4.00 for elaboration. These findings indicate that Indonesian products tended to manifest creative thinking through the elaboration and detailed development of historical content, whereas Thai products demonstrated relatively stronger flexibility, originality, and fluency through conceptual, narrative, and performative forms of historical representation. The findings suggest that creative thinking in Islamic History learning is not manifested through a single form of product or expression but is closely related to the affordances of learning activities and modes of historical representation. The study contributes to comparative research on creative thinking in Islamic History education by demonstrating how student-generated products can provide tangible evidence of creative engagement and meaningful historical understanding across different educational contexts.
References
Anazifa, R. D., & D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Abidin, R., & Agustina, E. (2025). Membaca Masa Lalu, Menulis Masa Depan: Pendidikan Sejarah Sebagai Aksi Kritis. Danadyaksa Historica, 5(2), 90–103.
Ariyanti, N., & Anggerawati, N. L. (2024). Analisis Problematika Pembelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam ( SKI ) di Madrasah Aliyah mengenalkan , memhamai dan menghayati sejarah Islam serta menjadi way of life melalui Dari pernyataan tersebut dapat dipahami bahwa dengan mempelajari sejarah kronologi maupun tokoh tokoh yang berpengaruh , siswa dapat terhubung dengan tradisi. 4(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.v4i1.1855
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2020). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas., 3(83), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Darmaji. (2025). Integrating Local Culture into Creativity Development: A Case Study of the Geti Asem Batik Program in Indonesian Primary Education. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3).
Davies, D., et al. (2018). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
El-Wakil, A. (2016). The Prophet’s Treaty with the Christians of Najran: An Analytical Study to Determine the Authenticity of the Covenants. Journal of Islamic Studies, 27(3), 273–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etw027
Faruq, M., Futaqi, S., Rahmawati, Z. D., & Mateh, B. (2026). The Integration of Local Muslim Culture in Islamic Education : Adaptation and Negotiation within Madrasahs in Indonesia and Southern Thailand.
Guilherme, M., & Dietz, G. (2016). Difference in diversity: Multiple perspectives in multicultural education. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. doi:10.1080/17447143.2015.1015539
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. (2020). How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact of Student Factors on Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education – Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 2(51), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5
Info, A., & Type, A. (2022). Turkish History Education Journal. 11(1), 1–20.
Jalil, D. M., Handayani, S., & Wasliman, E. D. (n.d.). Manajemen Pembelajaran SKI di MTs Berbasis Meaning Maker dalam Upaya Menghidupkan Makna dan Nilai Sejarah Islam. 1–10.
Khusnul Khotimah. (2022). Application of Islamic Cultural-Historical Values in Developing the Character of Learners in Islamic Elementary School. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5 No.1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1866
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 3(19), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Ministry of Education and Culture Indonesia. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Kebijakan pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Ministry of Education Thailand. (2017). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (revised edition). Ministry of Education Thailand.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Popa, N. (2023). How Meaning Making Cultivates Historical Consciousness : Identifying a Learning Trajectory and Pedagogical Guidelines to Promote It How Meaning Making Cultivates Historical Consciousness : Identifying a. 7996. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2022.2140641
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 1(24), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Thomas, J., Condliffe, B., & Quint, J. (2015). Whatever Form a Project Takes , It Must Meet These Criteria To Be Gold Standard PjBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 22(1), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0045-1
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Ulya, A., Sassi, K., Program, P., Magister, S., & Agama, P. (2024). Komparasi kebijakan kurikulum pendidikan agama islam di indonesia dan thailand. 9(2), 355–368.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wahyudi, A., Yulifar, L., & Saripudin, D. (2024). Kesadaran Sejarah Siswa SMA Melalui Kunjungan ke Museum Pendidikan Nasional UPI sebagai Sumber Belajar Sejarah. 7(2), 115–126.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. Temple University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prawidya Lestari Widya, Raharjo, Ismail, Mahaphiyi Hama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).






