QUR'AN MEMORIZATION CURRICULUM MODEL AT BOARDING-BASED UNIVERSITIES

Authors

  • Umi Sa'adah Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
  • Dede Rosyada UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sapiudin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v15i01.10013

Keywords:

Curriculum Model, Qur'an Memorization, memorization learning methods, supporting factors and obstacles

Abstract

This research aims to uncover: 1). The history of boarding campuses; 2). The Qur'an memorization curriculum model at boarding-based universities (IIQ, PTIQ, and IDAQU); 3). Methods and techniques for learning and memorizing the Qur'an for boarding students; 4). Supporting and inhibiting factors for implementing the Qur'an memorization curriculum, its evaluation, and its influence on the achievement of boarding students. This research methodology uses a qualitative approach and focuses on the Al-Qur'an memorization curriculum model, namely by examining naturally occurring phenomena as a direct data source. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies as supporting information. The informants in this study were the head of the tahfidz institution as a key informant, institutional staff, tahfidz instructors, Islamic boarding school/ma'had administrators, and students. Data analysis techniques were carried out using qualitative analysis, consisting of data reduction, data display, and verification or drawing conclusions. These three activities are interrelated with each other. The research found the following results: First, IIQ was founded in 1977, PTIQ in 1971, and IDAQU in 2020. Second, the three boarding-based universities have different tahfidz curriculum models: IIQ Jakarta offers 5, 10, 20, and 30 Juz programs; PTIQ offers 30 Juz (full tahfidz), 3 Juz (limited tahfidz), and 1 Juz (employee class); and IDAQU categorizes studentsas mubtadi (beginner), mutawassit (intermediate), and mahir (advanced). Third, the primary Qur'an memorization learning method at all three boarding campuses is recitation. Fourth, both supporting and inhibiting factors exist in Qur'an memorization. A gradual/tiered memorization curriculum model can assist students in fulfilling their dual obligations of Qur'an memorization and academic studies. These findings offer a replicable framework for other higher education institutions seeking to integrate Qur'an memorization into their academic programs, particularly in boarding-based settings.

References

Abdurrohman, A. F. M., Amelia, E., & Rodoni, A. (2023). Analisis Kebijakan Ekonomi Syariah Zaman Rasulullah Saw Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Islam. AR RASYIID: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES Учредители: Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Minhaajurroosyidiin, 1(1), 1–12.

Akbar, F. M. A., Lazuardi, A., & Haniatunnisa, S. (2024). EVOLUSI PEMIKIRAN MANAJEMEN SYARIAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR DARI PERSPEKTIF HISTORIS. An Nawawi, 4(2), 187–204.

Alawiyah Wahid, W. (2014). Cara Cepat Bisa Menghafal Alquran. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.

Arikunto, S. (2010). prosedur penelitian, jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Syarifudin, Y.(2015). Kompetensi Menulis Kreatif. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Baduwailan, A. B. S. (2014). Cara Mudah dan Cepat Hafal Al-Qur’an. Solo: Kiswah Media.

Boyle, H. N. (2006). Memorization and learning in Islamic schools. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 478–495.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Desrani, A., & Juami, R. (2022). Pembelajaran Tahfidz Al-Qur’an: Studi Komparasi di SMP Plus Babussalam Bandung dan Pondok Pesantren Tahfidz Yatim Dhuafa Al-Afiyah Bandung. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 36–45.

Fauzi, M., & Fata, A. K. (2021). Modernisasi Pesantren Tahfiz: Studi atas Pesantren Daarul Qur’an Tangerang. POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 7(2), 207–227.

Masduki, Y. (2018). Implikasi psikologis bagi penghafal Al-Qur’an. Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(1), 18–35.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

Moleong, L. J., & Surjaman, T. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.

Muawanah, S., Said, A., Furqoni, R., Muzayanah, U., & Mustolehudin, M. (2022). Evaluating Mandatory Tahfȋẓ Quran Program Implementation at Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 239–254.

Muhammad, F., & Akbar, A. (2024). METODE KUALITATIF DAN KUANTITATIF PADA STUDI ISLAM. 2(2), 2986–5034. https://jurnal.staimi.ac.id/index.php/arrasyiid/DOI:https://doi.org/10.70367/arrasyiid.v2i2.23

Najati Usman Muhammad. (1982). Al-Qur’an wa ‘Ilm al-Nafs. Dar al-Suruq.

Robbaniyah, Q., & Lina, R. (2022). Administrasi Kurikulum Pembelajaran Tahfidz Di Pondok Pesantren Islamic Center Binbaz Yogyakarta. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 159–168.

Rohmatillah, S., & Shaleh, M. (2018). Manajemen Kurikulum Program Tahfidz Al-Qur’an di Pondok Pesantren Salafiyah Syafi’iyah Al-Azhar Mojosari Situbondo. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 3(1), 107–121.

Ruwaida, H. (2019). Proses kognitif dalam taksonomi bloom revisi: analisis kemampuan mencipta (c6) pada pembelajaran fikih di mi miftahul anwar desa banua lawas. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 51–76.

Sadulloh, S. Q. (2008). 9 Cara Praktis Menghafal Al-Quran. Gema Insani.

Simanjuntak, D. (2021). Faktor-faktor Pendukung dan penghambat dalam menghafal Al-Qur’an. Al FAWATIH: Jurnal Kajian Al Quran Dan Hadis, 2(2), 92–101.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan kurikulum teori dan praktik. Rosda.

Wiyarandi, U. K., KHAERUDIN, M. P., & Ariani, D. (2020). Pengembangan Kurikulum Program Tahfidz Al-Qur’an di Pondok Qur’an Bahrul Ulum Bogor. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 3(2), 79–87

Downloads

Published

15-03-2026

Citation Check