RELEVANCE OF LAW LABORATORY IN IMPROVING STUDENT COMPETENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v12i02.7467Keywords:
Laboratorium Hukum, Kompetensi, Relevansi, MahasiswaAbstract
The law laboratory is an essential facility that provides students with practical experience in applying the legal theories learned in class. The aim of this research is to assess the extent to which the law laboratory contributes to the development of practical skills, such as case analysis, legal communication, and argumentative abilities, as well as non-technical skills, such as teamwork and conflict management. The research methodology employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collection conducted through in-depth interviews, observations, and focus group discussions (FGDs) involving students, lecturers, and legal practitioners. The findings indicate that the law laboratory plays a significant role in improving both the technical and non-technical skills of students. Those actively participating in laboratory activities, such as trial simulations and negotiation exercises, demonstrate substantial improvements in their understanding of procedural law and their preparedness for entering the professional world. The research also highlights several challenges, including limited laboratory facilities and resources, as well as the need for an increase in the number of lecturers with practical legal experience. Recommendations from this study include enhancing laboratory facilities, integrating the law laboratory more structurally into the curriculum, and developing external collaborations with legal institutions to provide students with a more diverse range of experiences. Thus, it is hoped that the law laboratory can serve as a more effective instrument in producing law graduates who are competent and ready to compete in the global job market
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(3), 402-415.
Basrowi & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 28(1), 77-89.
Bailey, S., & Hughes, C. (2003). Achieving Teaching Excellence: Developing Your TEQSA Evidence Portfolio. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 275-287.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 41(4), 373-385.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 111-113.
Effendi, M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(2), 235-246.
Gredler, M. E. (2009). Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 81-88.
Indrayani, R. (2018). Pengembangan Kompetensi Hukum di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 48(1), 112-129.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 24(3), 193-195.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(1), 28-36.
Nasution, S. (2003). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik-Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 21-35.
Purwanto, M. N. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(3), 243-256.
Riduwan. (2008). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 10(1), 12-27.
Santoso, S. (2015). Menguasai Statistik di Era Big Data. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 14(2), 99-110.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Journal of Education for Teaching, 9(2), 137-151.
Silbey, S. S., & Ewick, P. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1494-1496.
Siregar, N.Z & Syam, A.M. (2024). The Influence of Digital Library Service Quality On Student Satisfaction. PERSPEKTIF: Journal of Social and Library Science 2 (2), 40-48.
Stratman, J. F. (2002). Legal Writing as a Tool for Problem Solving. Journal of Legal Education, 52(3), 519-534.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Risyad Fakar Lubis, Adlin Budhiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms that must be met by the Author as follows:- The author saves the copyright and grants the journal the first right of publishing the manuscript simultaneously under license under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with a statement of job authorship and early publication in this journal.
- The author may incorporate into additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of rich-issue journals (eg posting them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), with the acknowledgment of their original publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg: in the institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful cites from published works.
 
						



