DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION OF “VERY URGENT REASONS” IN MARRIAGE DISPENSATION APPLICATIONS (Kajian Penetapan Nomor 0034/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Kr dan Penetapan Nomor 0078//Pdt.P/2021/PA.Kr)

Authors

  • Rizky Firman Nugraha UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Alfi Syahputra UIN Imam Bonjol Padang , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v12i02.7459

Keywords:

Dispensasi Kawin, Penafsiran Hukum, Alasan Sangat Mendesak

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence of two judges' decisions at the Krui Religious Court Class II, West Lampung regarding the marriage dispensation case. The type of research used in this study is library research which is descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach. The results of the study show that the judge in case Number 0034/Pdt.P/2020/Pa.Kr granted the marriage dispensation application using a systematic and grammatical interpretation method because the very urgent reasons had been met, namely formal and administrative requirements and by granting the marriage dispensation, it could minimize or even eliminate damage rather than allowing the relationship to continue without a marriage bond. Meanwhile, the judge in case Number 0078/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Kr rejected the marriage dispensation application using the historical and comparative interpretation method. Although formally and administratively the application was fulfilled, materially the judge was of the opinion that the very urgent reasons for the marriage had not been fulfilled, due to physical unpreparedness, psychological immaturity and economic instability. In fact, there will be greater potential for harm if marriage is forced.

References

Dirdjosisworo, S. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Hasibuan, H. A. L., & Nst, A. H. (2023). Metode Penafsiran Hukum Sebagai Alat Mencari Keadilan Hakiki. Jurnal Legisia, 15, 136–145.

Indrati S, M. F. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan 1: Jenis, fungsi, dan materi muatannya. Kanisius.

Kurniawan, M. B., & Refiasari, D. (2022). Penafsiran Makna “Alasan Sangat Mendesak” Dalam Penolakan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.508

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putusan, D., Agung, M., Indonesia, R., Keadilan, D., Ketuhanan, B., & Maha, Y. (2021). Penetapan Nomor 0078/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Kr Tentang Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin.

Putusan, D., Agung, M., Indonesia, R., Keadilan, D., Ketuhanan, B., Maha, Y., Barat, P., & Ii, P. (2020). Penetapan Nomor 0034/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Kr Tentang Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin.

Rohmah, S. (2021). Batas Usia Menikah dalam Prespektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum di Indonesia. Tahkim, XVII(1), 1–15.

Saleh, K. W. (1976). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, 006265, 2–6. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/122740/uu-no-16-tahun-2019

Sitti Mawar. (2015). METODE PENEMUAN HUKUM (Interpretasi Dan Konstruksi) DALAM RANGKA HARMONISASI HUKUM. 6.

Syauqi Fuady. (2014). Penerapan UU Nomor. 1 1974 dan No 23 tahun 2002 dalam penentapan dispensasi kawin di Pa Padang. UIN IB Padang.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Firman Nugraha , R., & Syahputra, A. (2024). DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION OF “VERY URGENT REASONS” IN MARRIAGE DISPENSATION APPLICATIONS (Kajian Penetapan Nomor 0034/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Kr dan Penetapan Nomor 0078//Pdt.P/2021/PA.Kr). Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 12(02). https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v12i02.7459

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 02 (2024): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rizky Firman Nugraha , Alfi Syahputra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Terms that must be met by the Author as follows:
    1. The author saves the copyright and grants the journal the first right of publishing the manuscript simultaneously under license under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with a statement of job authorship and early publication in this journal.
    2. The author may incorporate into additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of rich-issue journals (eg posting them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), with the acknowledgment of their original publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg: in the institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful cites from published works.