Analysis of Assessment Instrument For Tahfiz Al-Qur’an at East Jakarta Elementary School

Authors

  • Ernawari Ernawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-7366
  • Sintha Wahjusaputri Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Giyanti Giyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hari Setiadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i03.4463

Keywords:

Assessment, Instrument, Tahfiz, Al-Qur’an, Elementary School

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the tahfiz Al-Qur'an instrument developed by teachers at an elementary school in East Jakarta. The descriptive qualitative methodology was adopted in this research. This study's subject was teachers that teach tahfiz Al-Qur’an at elementary schools in East Jakarta, and the object was twelve instruments created by Tahfiz teachers in East Jakarta. The data gathering method is carried out by assessing the instruments developed by teachers. The instruments were analyzed by two experts and discussed in Forum Group Discussion (FGD) and engaged practitioners, there were tahfiz teachers in East Jakarta. Beside that the, the data collection is carried out through interviews dan document study. The interview guide is used to reinforce the data related to the tahfiz teacher's knowledge of the concept of assessment. The results showed that the assessment instrument made by tahfiz teachers at the elementary school level in East Jakarta still needs to be revised to meet the assessment principles. These instruments also need to be developed to produce systematic scoring criteria and guidelines. The conformity level on material aspect on average score 2,61; construct aspect on average score 1,42; usage language aspect on average score 2,10, and average total conformity on score 2,04.

Author Biography

Ernawari Ernawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta

Departement of Education

References

Abualrob, M. M. A., & Al-Saadi, S. H. (2019). Performance-Based Assessment: Approach and Obstacles by Higher-Elementary Science Teachers in Palestine. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n2p198

Afriani, L. (2020). Efektivitas Program Tahfidz di Sekolah Menengah Atas negeri 4 Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. UIN Sultan Thaha Saifudin.

Al-Attas, N. (1980). The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for An Philosophy of Education. ABIM.

Al-Mahmud, S. M. (1995). Hidayatul Mustafid (p. 57).

Annuri, A. (2019). Panduan Tahsin Tilawah Al Qur’an & Ilmu Tajwid (XVIII). IQI.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Penelitian (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. (2018). Evaluasi Program (VI). Bumi Aksara.

Dewi, D. S., & Rosana, D. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja untuk Mengukur Sikap Ilmiah. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1, 67–83.

Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: an integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445

Hartini, P., Setiadi, H., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411

Kunandar. (2014). Penilaian Otentik: Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta DidikBerdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. PT Grafindo Persada.

Majid, A. (2017). Penilaian Autentik : Proses dan Hasil Belajat (A. Kamsyach (ed.); III). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom assessment : principles and practice that enhance student learning and motivation.

Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Kamus Al Munawwir Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap (XIV). Pustaka Progressif.

Mutu, T. P. (2018). Pedoman Monitoring dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. UIN Raden Patah.

Noer, S., Evi, ;, & Rusydiyah, F. (2019). MODEL EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN TAHFIDZUL QUR’AN BERBASIS COIN PRO 2 (Studi komparasi pembelajaran tahfidz di Turki, Malaysia dan Indonesia). EDURELIGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(2), 138–150.

Pahlevi, Z. (2022). Tiga Kriteria Penilaian Lomba Hifdzil Quran MTQN 2022 Dari Dewan Hakim. Dutatv.Com.

Permendikbud, Pub. L. No. Permendikbud (2016). https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/munp2

RI, K. P. dan K. (2018). Buku Guru: Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Sabri, A. (2020). Trends of “Tahfidz House†Program in Early Childhood Education. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 14(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.141.06

Sasongko, A. (2017). Tren Menghafal Alquran Makin Berkembang. Republika.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian dan Pengembangan (S. Y. Suryandari (ed.); 4th ed.). Alfabeta.

Supardi. (2016). Penilaian Autentik: Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor (II). RajaGrafindo.

Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur Penyusunan & Analisis Tes: untuk Penelitian Hasil Belajar Bidang Kognitif. refika ADITAMA.

Syafutri, M. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Membelajaran Cashier Mathematics (CAMATH) Berbasis Android Menggunakan Adobe Animate CC 2018 pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. Universitas Islam Majapahit.

Tahfizh, T. (2017). Buku Pedoman Tahfiz PPTQ Ibnu Abbas Klaten.

Tsa. (2021). Wisuda Akbar Hafiz Indonesia 2021 Hadirkan 3 Peserta Terpilih. SINDONEWS.COM.

Yunus, M. (1990). Kamus Arab - Indonesia (8th ed.). PT. Hidakarya Agung.

Downloads

Published

21-08-2023

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 03 (2023): Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).